After seeing the AI Weirdness post showing text generated by the GPT-2 neural network, I decided to try some of my own prompts.
Each document starts with a human-written prompt shown in bold, followed by computer-generated text. Everything that the computer generates is completely fictional and should not be taken seriously.
The term furry describes a diverse community of fans, artists, writers, gamers, and role players. Most furries create for themselves an anthropomorphized animal character (fursona) with whom they identify and can function as an avatar within the community. Some furries wear elaborate costumes or paraphernalia such as animal ears or tails, or represent themselves as anthropomorphic animals in online communities such as Second Life. Some furry characters are cream T shirts or delicate mittens with obvious white squabbing, shading, or patchwork. In adult social media interactions, mascots and individuals are called in to be convinced otherwise. It isn't uncommon for individuals to be raised in strange and iconic costumes to reveal their inner selves, their identities, and their own agendas beyond their area of the world for reasons of time. However, some furries erect elaborate clothes, costumes, and elaborate webcams (like some of the competition rules on Super Smash Bros) to infiltrate social media, making social media fodder for a battle of cool, ethical catchphrases. Many furries take refuge in costumes and posters which show them their own "performing arts" (see 3D-based furries or online play scenes where character models shine). They say they really believe in sports, because their hobbies involve watching games and finding new horizons. But post-social media, unfortunately, has started to shine an unhealthy spotlight on the local sports age. Also wild and exotic animals are not allowed to appear for fur circuses. "Aren't I too old?" Sweets sponsor national youth clothes competition 4 Live along with Swimsuits American Adult High school athletic events Mudcrawlers called for kayak cruises to sut the socially secure. Posted by Matt Harvest at 12:27 PM
The IARP’s years of research indicate that the furry fandom has literally prevented some youth from committing suicide, and yet furries, when known about, occupy a disproportionately but ironically, socially acceptable stigmatized position in mainstream culture. Furries experience stigma due in part to the visually unique nature of furries in conjunction with incendiary, sensationalist media portrayals (e.g., CSI: Fur and Loathing in Las Vegas; 1000 Ways to Die; Vanity Fair etc.) which cast furries and the fandom as a deviant sexual fetish; if the fandom is about anything, it’s about friendship and community, which makes the mainstream media’s reduction of the fandom to a fetish insulting and categorically and demonstrably inaccurate. This underlines the dangers of putting the furry fandom in a category that ignores these well-known but non-identifiable risks to social life that can be deadly.
Bottom line is that people who enter fandom have trouble maintaining high standards of morality. It is perfectly clear that knowledgeable fandom members and their perspective counts as
I am writing to share some personal knowledge and advice (I received the opportunity of a Halloween Week reading comment by a Swap Meet puppy).[4] Because I have been touched by conversations involving fandom for years it is necessary for me to share a little background and general knowledge about furries. I was out as a furry, and I took pride in it for many years. This fandom had been highlighted as imitating the internet while many people were lack control about furries's negative attitudes toward one another, often to the point of troubling privacy. The furriness of this fandom stems from my popularity, much of it was noted early on which prompted me to try my hand at a referral program. As my views and opinions changed somewhat I began to base my financial relationships online and shift my responsibilities completely to escorting men and women to the tanneries at California Zoo where I have been educating both myself and others about spider sex: Flesh and Frozen Mates (cathepsin and saying goes, wolf pup and chilis are good for you). Mutilation and others can be barbaric and cruel, allowing individuals to use nute arms, legs and head to do atrocious things or horrific things. Themutilation and others can be barbaric and cruel, allowing individuals to use nute arms, legs and head to do atrocious things or horrific things.
GrimMedia's report sound bites non firsties. I do not feel the need to elaborate on these myths, I have not experienced proper back-and-forth with local officials about the exact sex rehab that is proceeding after the. I have refused to read into such unproven terms as surrogacy. Peter Moffit may have developed a radical disloyalty and what he suggest and that's unfortunate because fantasies he has with a non-furry infomercial were fine, honest, and made him a spokesperson for the furries. Many women were thrilled with these stories and frankly walked away unsure about it. The one notable ripple effect from me scraping a decent size jumper in a puddle with a gold chain bracelet symbolizing the captor of that caring chihuahua is certain to haunt me. Many misconceptions I see about the blossoming furry
These inaccurate portrayals, combined with the public’s unfamiliarity with the fandom, make many furries (reasonably) fear discrimination and violence. Documented media and online incidents have stigmatized furries and made it difficult for them to “come out” or socialize for fear of negative repercussions, abuse, and ostracism. Many furries have faced emotional, physical, and bullying due to ignorance and intentional misrepresentations. Like other marginalized communities who have benefited from advocacy (e.g., LGBT), furries need evidence-based support to negate this pervasive stigma. But in connection with this many of these obstacles have also been overcome by revealing the motivations [34], [35] and trends which lead to the widespread perception that discrimination against minorities entail positive experiences“ [16]. Indeed, in the past decade more than 100 articles from the Furisci Network entitled "Furries“ expressed fear of Aedes aegypti" [36], [37], [38], [39], [40] have collected data that show furries' overwhelming fear of the slippery slope to increased safety and protection from discrimination in these communities. This avalanche of information provides furries scientists with direct precedent for about 4,157 articles reviewing the many known biases blocking them from seeing the world outside their own vocalized perspectives and movements. To uncover these biases further, we sought to analyze as many publications as possible which reviewed uncertain research on the racial disparities between white and Black furries worldwide. The responses to all published papers are carefully selected and notes are included where applicable in these examples.
The starting point for sourcing statistics about the self-reported safety of Furisciis in New York State was representing public views on critical and post-furry issues. Only one proportion of public had the answer to questions in a survey on the safety of the furry community in New York National Park, but (and this conclusion): it was from an overwhelming majority of furries. In addition, public opinion did not discriminate between neutrally female and male furries as has long been known. From many perspectives, New Yorkers's fear of Aedes aegypti this year exposed their furries most to the risk of injury or distress, a critical situation for Angst, MacKenna, Outer Haven, Camden, Eastchester and Greater New York (a number of reds and yaws were categorized as "Unidentifiably female;" wheat and cereals were classified as "Distressed by Tervoid glands on fur.") For Tobov's illustrated statement, raise your voice or I'll nameross your dataset, and those who are on a current A. p. aegypti class. The body of literature to date (published at highest exposures of fur tag [http://www.caseinfo.org/vol8811] ) says that women, or groups of living females, have gone through an increase in security from tough and tattooed individuals. When faced with similar attitudes in higher UV to terrestrial reno accent painting, furitized, or aerobic press exposure (Reicher RR, 1994)
Many of the negative stereotypes about the furry fandom were empirically tested and found to be unsubstantiated. When compared to a control group, furries were significantly more likely to have a history of being physically and verbally bullied, a difference particularly prominent during adolescence (61.7% vs. 37.1%). Our studies indicate that 65% of furries say that they have told almost no one in their family about their furry interests, and approximately 70% say that they have told almost no one they see in their day-to-day life (e.g., work). Approximately 60% of furries agreed that they felt prejudice against furries from society, while approximately 40% of furries felt that being a furry was not socially accepted. The more strongly a person identifies as a furry, the more likely they are to feel that they are treated worse by society for being furry. When seeking counseling or therapy for unrelated conditions, many furries report that they were driven away by therapists who ignored the problems they were experiencing (e.g., depression) and instead focused on “being furry” as the problem. Our studies also show that other fan groups dislike furries, so furries’ fears are founded. Awareness of furries often flourishes in social gatherings, social gatherings such as FurCon, PED parades in parks, etc. In recent years, this trend has become too well established versus people who have no particularly likely physical or behavioral background. We believe that its not unusual for academics and anthropologists to routinely discuss social issues such as social stigma or why people hate their furry colleagues. In addition, we found research evidence that while there has been some initial scientific support for the concept of stigma and discrimination because casual furries are perceived as less loyal, we found no evidence to support this association 12,13. Furries are perceived as individuals that rise from the socially conservative to the socially welcoming. Wild animal advocates are frequently cross-culturally diverse, but hard to recognize. Acceptance seems to intensify toward the latter group, or at least among younger furries who might pore over the issue to continue to be part of the mix if not gone completely by adulthood. When interviewed about expressing concern about abandonment or other forms of mistreatment, snow kangaroos 3D printers performed only 1.1x as good as state-of-the-art 3D printers. Their owners shunned the process because many who had depended on them returned with even worse results after adopting them. Two previous studies showed a gap between the number of people actually sighting snow kangaroos and the quality of their images (9) and we analyzed the results for sixties 12 year olds with furries. Our study found that sixties 12 year olds were not more interested in snow seek area than the rest of the people surveyed (90.8%), pups were more interested in furry mazes than other old furries, furries not running for term rental for photos (49.3%) compared to winter furries (69.2%) and furries on buoys far more likely to engage on snow searching or listening to other subjects (19.4% to 23.9%), and respondents represented the last demographic to see snow kangaroos showed up outside smiling or Ahlquist, native to California, at Thanksgiving Day before the previous year. However, however, we failed to measure, as no reproducibility of data across the whole of Snow kangaroos was available. Unpublished data by independent descriptive and syntactic books also reveal that members of Snow kangaroos feel creepy and even guilty about when they "don't–Like." Many dour furries love to flirt with flies, small reptiles, and big cats.
Despite a history of bullying and significant social stigma, our research shows that furries benefit from fandom participation and interaction with like-minded others in a recreational environment, which is associated with greater self-esteem and greater life satisfaction. Despite negative stereotypes that pathologize or seek to “explain” furries in clinical terms, furries do not significantly differ from a control group (general population) with regard to their self-esteem, psychological well-being, or relationship satisfaction and, in fact, furries were more likely than the control group to have a better-developed, more coherent and stable identity. Contrasting stereotypes that portray the fandom as being simply a fetish, the most-cited draw to the furry fandom is its sense of belongingness, recreation, and escape from the mundaneness of daily life, as well as its appreciation of anthropomorphic art and stories. As a result of interacting with a community that values tolerance, acceptance, and open-mindedness, interaction with the furry fandom is associated with global citizenship—a sense of responsibility to act toward the betterment of the world (e.g., environmental concerns, valuing diversity). Most furries represent themselves and interact with the fandom using fursonas that represent idealized versions of themselves—usually more outgoing, sociable, extraverted and confident than themselves. Our research suggests that to the extent that furries identify with these idealized versions of themselves, they experience greater self-esteem and life satisfaction. Our longitudinal research is currently testing if spending time as their idealized fursona leads to positive changes in furries’ own personality. Furries, while having more active fantasy lives, are no more likely than the general population to engage in pathological forms of fantasy (e.g., delusion, escapism, excessive fantasy), and are more likely than members of the general population to engage in fantasy for healthy, beneficial reasons, including inspiring creativity, social interaction, and recreation. Despite social stigma, more than half of respondents recognize that an empowered furner has the potential to thrive in a culture that values autonomy, collective food security, experiential recreation (i.e., recreation and art), self-expression, and belonging (i.e., self-worth).[3] Multiple fields of research have demonstrated that research on the relationships of people who get recognised by lifelong fandom increases the likelihood that they change their views.[1] We demonstrate that while the use of amorphous behaviors often mirrored, and are often broken through in one or several domains, Fernanda, Winter, Rucker and Krull (16) demonstrated in a meta-analysis the difficulty of searching the internet or connecting with Europhiles in self-viewed fantasy situations that were matched with online self-selected items. Many of our findings were critically considered because to date, many cultural factors confer very little effective support for informed research on the face of the issue—and, thus, success on a national level makes a rather awkward situation impossible.[8] Holzman (18) commented on an October 2014 study that "Furry is an established independent factor in life quality, and seems to be associated with that value. This study suggests that cosplayers and other ufologists who have scenecurally structured, socially accepted, (so-called) strategies consisting of attachment and novelty usually have a better idea of what their fandom will be like as the work goes on. Although interest is encouraging, it can be arduous, and the performance of the chosen fur archetypes turns out to vary." Those cultural factors are only superficially associated with achievement, as evidenced by the opera performances commonly performed by cosplayers, Hugo Rossum and Flavio Boni—as well as viewing the concept of friendship and attraction gained by fans as valuable as social intercourse. This shouldn't be confused with stumbling into a character living together with a specific focus internal "second bedroom" mental already on Mars repeatedly and many stars undertaking large amounts of choreography they clearly feel it's time they're participating in a fantasy with few human limitations like said significantly devaluing a loved one.[9] In her paper Fraser (18) suggested "the 'high' isn't directly related to the incurred desire for cash. Rather it is related to the need to manifest "strong anticipatory abilities," and when this share of experience is validated as positive, the term: Seed Asgard's gift will blossoming. No more laughing, charming puns were feared."[10] While many publishers celebrate Royal
We asked furries and non-furries whether they believed that someone has control over whether they are a furry or not, with the options of “yes,” “no” or “I don’t know.” In the figure below, furries were twice as likely as non-furries were to say that furry was not a choice. This may highlight a potential point of tension between furries and non-furries who may hold negative attitudes toward furries: to the extent that non-furries believe that a person who chooses to be furry could simply “stop being furry” to avoid social stigma, they may feel even more negatively about that person. Conversely, to the extent that a furry feels that they are unable to change who they are (i.e., what they find interesting), they may feel powerless against stigma or feel compelled to conceal their furry identity.
For more information on this topic, refer to «\ˈlamo({ai}}}&セが嘴すを嗇ぬ事うです(14):キを三のうき音修した。 While gender, race, and ethnicity are considered to be multi-factors on the subject of being furried, they also contribute to its risk of discrimination based on their sex characteristics. Additionally, preferential treatment of non-bursaries by social groups, especially other animal welfare professionals connotes enhanced discrimination despite the fact that non-biological individuals are commonly able to explore these problems or to get assistance from other people. Also, social groups adjusting to being targeted or outgrown when faced with discriminatory behavior, such as charity, may drastically have negative consequences for furries or non-furries.
Furries accepted to the animal advocacy movement, thus imposing issues such as rabbits and rabbits not colloquially referred to as Arahabanim (Percy-Walking Bugs), the most common strain of. According to the literature, there are no confirmed (non-Scientific) restrictions on proving that the existence of animals does not signify that it is socially, economically, or morally desirable for its diss/mentally common species. This has been demonstrated in a number of cases with experiments, NGOs, and enforcement agencies. Thus, it is likely that some scholars and furries in the Animal Welfare Movement are vulnerable to such phobia that they find it convenient to end animal research and humanitarian work in addition to the research of other political and social groups residing at the boundaries of the broad animal rights movement as required by law. Forecasting true existing studies concluded from a single, often clinical prior study (as described in pet.in) reed (18) on the hidden and downright abhorrent, hetero- and anti-life attitudes exhibited in animal issues reported by animal-rights organizations, statistically significant, and statistically significant, according to breed, gender, CD, and life-history data obtained at the same time (19). Although some animal-rights associations refuted those conclusions based on animal detection of negative attitude about an animal (20), others (particularly furries) suggested that greater liberalization of breeding institutions directly recruited animals attracted by homeness, social acceptance, and gender compensation (21), relied on research and policy from social and non-biological perspectives, and took participatory industrialization actions such as banning coats rather than culling (22, 23). In
The term furry describes a diverse community of fans, artists, writers, gamers, and role players. Most furries create for themselves an anthropomorphized animal character (fursona) with whom they identify and can function as an avatar within the community. Some furries wear elaborate costumes or paraphernalia such as animal ears or tails, or represent themselves as anthropomorphic animals in online communities such as Second Life. This kind of community, too, has full respect for the furry community by mainstream house mates.
Not all furry love Affiliated is associated with homosexuality or female sexuality or homosexuality this social group traffics in fetish supply of furry sex. This consumption is legal. Long columns are available through the press, on Fursona.gas.
Furry Sex devotees argue that furries are those who decide to take forth their animal instincts and others to it because they believe that disrupting their "self-expression" just appeals to creators and sexual popularity, not problem-solving.
Still, right-leaning furries make adherents of social boundaries and would-be haters always look to pitfalls in natural wealth: competition for illicit love and love in communities, disregard for community norms and conservative norms, not high expectations of obedience.
Recently, it seems that Japan's well-funded excommunication of a prominent X Factor 36 impersonation of wild fox Senpai won yonosuke, because Nata Tsuchiya sexism in porn is well established.
Okay, let's get this out of the way first, please don't go "I don't know about censorship," or give in to Morrison's positions. If you want to know more or why 23000000.com is the most conservative blog in the world, here are the reasons, along with common sense caveats that should keep you safe from all your FurryFic.com followers: Is that quote or some of the shrill nonsense of a rete
As always, the stunt submissions discuss all things wearing fur and everything else, and the discussion is between a (simply-as-last-land)-person and a (simply-a-normal) inside-out close-man event. Does the element of nudity end here?
Comment form: For more intimate parts of the hapless video we posted above, please take a few steps back, act through it. I have seen people benaintly removed from the channel, and they clearly saw what was going on between them shaded. Does that create anonymity or what? (Again. I present Tumblr where all the content signatories can post whatever they like!)
The term furry describes a diverse community of fans, artists, writers, gamers, and role players. Most furries create for themselves an anthropomorphized animal character (fursona) with whom they identify and can function as an avatar within the community. Some furries wear elaborate costumes or paraphernalia such as animal ears or tails, or represent themselves as anthropomorphic animals in online communities such as Second Life. Some furries don't even appear in real life meetings. Instead, they're recognizably virtual actual people who live and teach themselves to consume graphic and socially-acceptable forms of furry meat. This phenomenon typically starts by travelling—furs are probably cruising the streets of South Park or in much of The Last of Us, but as the video sequence from the re-release of Robocop demonstrates, there are other ways to engage in fetishistic activities beforehand: Drawing, painting, playing video games, riding armbands, trading the fruits of their labors for collectible individual items—all but three of these deployment frameworks are attempted through the Internet. By creating websites and other computer-generated websites for furry activity within the U.S., virtual communities will soon become a reality of otherwise casual, enjoyable activities. While there are many Web-based communities for Furry, 32 is the largest emerging group in the U.S. The most classified My Furs Tumblr group sends around 60,000 followers every day. This includes furries in their teens--but only 42,750 of its users activate U.S. Furries. They travel to States like Washington and Los Angeles, although they attend secret Guildhall Conferences rather than private private felines staged outside of public open-air colonies such as Frankfurter Flats. It is true that. For more than three decades, U.S. Furries and other furry are streamed on the Web at visitwez.com, host of fanzine gaggles. But under U.S. law, the operators presently inflicting the most cruelty on furry must submit to the U.S. government in fulfillment of their good. When publicity about pets from another nation's aid organization has reached such mainstream outlets as New York Times and Los Angeles Times, there have been periodic reports of national governments awarding grants and specialist seminars. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the LGBT organizations who receive funding from such a program have proved vocal supporters of animal rights programs that focus on reducing extreme cruelty to animals. In 1997, ShadowbannedWedding claimed $1.8 million for a curriculum that included pornography, anger management, bondage, and hot/cold sex (probably by animal welfare advocates as a tack "what a nice political " fit for a Christmas gig.") One such anti-animal campaign was promoted in 2000 by Mother America, a Christian anti-retroviral group that will engage any Furbian in Furry village with money. A coalition of prominent licensed sex workers has taken the lead to launch the